*Image Source: Pexels

In this half-political and half-private world, the number of public-private partnerships is ever increasing. This world is controlled by global regulators that are either control explicitly or implicitly. Public-private denotes the joint management or joint management of a public facility such as water system and streets, to name some.

Public investments are meant to be public goods. However, the provider cannot adequately provide the benefits. The issue that goes with this concept is that many people want something from it, but nobody can adequately provide it.

There are instances when these public-private partnerships transition to privatization. In other instances, these also mean using tax breaks, taxpayer support, and regulatory easing to sponsor private activities that include mass transit, downtown and development districts. However, there are challenges that stem out from these public-private partnerships and these include:

• Exchange of political votes: Those in the political arena exchange votes if the others will vote for their PPP.
• Projects are implemented not because these will benefit the citizens but rather because it will benefit a certain group of people.
• Weaker management. Mangers are unmotivated in searching for financing tools and services that will be profitable. Charter schools and roads suffer from these.
• Deficiency in innovation. Private institutions will not allow themselves to stagnate. Managers of PPPs can always bail out to the public for taxpayer bailouts.
• The PPP world abounds with crony capitalism.
• Crowding out: Capital allocation is a crucial part in capitalism. It starts the seeds for the future. PPPs make this task a difficult one. The country’s wealth is seized by the government and the concept of public-private partnerships distorts the market forces’ allocation.

The challenge is to seek methods on the expansion of the private sector and this rarely occurs during the PPP concept. It permits people to be sloppy. People will always think that they need help from the government.

This mixed economy model is less functional. If things do not go on as planned, capitalism and not the government will be put into blame. PPP activities are less under the scrutiny of the consumers. The real activity costs do not appear on government budgets—thus, it makes it appear that PPP arrangements are discounts.